"A spokesman for Reuters said its journalists had entered with consent and "focused our reporting on the images and aspects of the scene that are newsworthy.The only potential legal issue, experts said, could be showing the personal information of living people, such as the social security card and driver's license belonging to Farook's mother that MSNBC briefly displayed on camera.

At 24 hours, the search was actually longer than the typical property search, she said."FBI: Not a crime sceneSome questioned how agents could have finished searching the townhouse, as part of what the FBI is describing as a "federal terrorism investigation," in just 24 hours.

"There are cases where we need to preserve a location, but that's extremely rare."‘Overwhelming’ sceneThe constitution mandates that the FBI release private property to the owner once it completes its search, said Rory Little, a former U."What great new information and insight did this provide that made it so important that not only everyone rush in, in a big herd, but also put this on-air live and show personal items " Drechsel said. But, she said, it was unclear whether damages could be collected if no items were taken.Regardless of the law, Dreschel said, the decision to carry live coverage while reporters examined personal items not clearly connected to the shooters, such as photographs of family members, raised ethical questions, he said.""It was kind of like a blitz," he said, adding that the FBI "should have had better control over this house. At one point, as CNN aired live video of the apartment, the network's analyst, Harry Houck, said he had "chills down my spine" that reporters were handling potential evidence.New York: The decision by a landlord on Friday to allow news reporters into the home of the couple who massacred 14 people in California provoked outrage on social media but likely broke no laws, legal and media experts said.The network said in a statement that it had entered with permission from the landlord.MSNBC immediately began trending on social media after showing the mother's identification cards, as outraged commenters faulted the network for disregarding privacy."Mohammad Abuershaid, an attorney for the Steam Turbine Bearings family, said they felt that the media's entry into the house was "an invasion of privacy."Now you have thousands of fingerprints all over inside of this crime scene," he said.News organisations likely would not be legally liable for going in with the landlord's permission, said Robert Drechsel, a professor at the University of Wisconsin School of Journalism and Mass Communication." He said photographers and camera crews were "taking unacceptable pictures of private things in the house, such as family photos and clothing.Miller told reporters he allowed the media to enter but said he was surprised at how "overwhelming" the scene quickly became.S."We did a very thorough search and took our time and completed it," she said..Karen Carrera, a San Francisco attorney who has represented tenants, said the landlord could theoretically face legal action from the Farook estate because California law requires landlords to preserve a tenant's belongings.

A crib with several colorful blankets and a prayer rug were inside a baby's room.In response to Reuters, Laura Eimiller, a spokeswoman for the FBI in Los Angeles, said it was not a "crime scene" and that it was irresponsible for news organizations to suggest the agency had not taken enough time to search the townhouse."Representatives for CNN and Fox News said they had permission and exercised editorial judgment in refraining from showing sensitive information such as identification cards and photographs.Malik, 29, and Farook, 28, were killed in a shootout with police hours after the attack at a social services agency in San Bernardino on Wednesday, during which 14 people were killed and 21 were wounded.Negative reaction on social media was swift and widespread.

Reporters rifled through documents, picked up baby toys and thumbed through family photos, all live on television.Eugene Volokh, a law professor at the University of California in Los Angeles, said newsgathering is also exempted from state law regarding the commercial use of images. Neighbors also appeared to freely enter the home.In an unusual scene carried live by major television networks, dozens of journalists, including Reuters employees, swarmed through the townhouse where Tashfeen Malik and her husband Syed Farook had lived with their six-month-old daughter.The townhouse contained several religious books, including a children's book called "Islamic Manners," and a tapestry on the wall bearing Arabic script.Representatives for local police departments, including the San Bernardino Sheriff's Department, said the FBI controlled the crime scene.

And, it added, "We regret that we briefly showed images of photographs and identification cards that should not have been aired without review.The landlord, Doyle Miller, used a crowbar to pry away plywood that was barricading the door, and told reporters the Federal Bureau of Investigation had cleared the apartment and said he could open it.Wesley Lowery, a national security reporter for the Washington Post, on Twitter called the scene "a massive failure of two vital institutions - media and law enforcement. Justice Department official

Megosztás a facebookon

study, researchers tracked more than 170,000 men and women over roughly 20 years, looking at what they said in health questionnaires given every two years.S. But a new U.The nicotine in cigarettes can suppress appetite and boost metabolism.S.The researchers checked which study participants quit smoking and followed whether they gained weight and developed diabetes, heart disease or other conditions."The New England Journal of Medicine published the study Wednesday.. The journal also published a Swedish study that found quitting smoking seems to be the best thing diabetics can do to cut their risk of dying prematurely.Quitters saw their risk of diabetes increase by 22 percent in the six years after they kicked the habit.In the U.But that risk doesn&PTFE bearings39;t endure, and it never leads to a higher premature death rate than what smokers face, he said. Qi Sun, one the study's authors.NEW YORK: If you quit smoking and gain weight, it may seem like you're trading one set of health problems for another. He is a researcher at the Harvard-affiliated Brigham and Women's Hospital.The people enrolled in the studies were all health professionals, and did not mirror current smokers in the general population, who are disproportionately low-income, less-educated and more likely to smoke heavily. Many smokers who quit and don't step up their # exercise find they eat more and gain weight - typically less than 10 pounds (4. William Dietz, a public health expert at George Washington University.Compared with smokers, even the quitters who gained the most weight had at least a 50 percent lower risk of dying prematurely from heart disease and other causes, the Harvard-led study found.Studies previously showed that people who quit have an elevated risk of developing diabetes, said Dr.5 kilograms), but in some cases three times that much. "Regardless of the amount of weight gain, quitters always have a lower risk of dying" prematurely, Sun said.A lot of weight gain is a cause of the most common form of diabetes, a disease in which blood sugar levels are higher than normal. study finds you're still better off in the long run.The study is impressive in its size and scope and should put to rest any myth that there are prohibitive weight-related health consequences to quitting cigarettes, said Dr. An editorial in the journal characterized it as "a mild elevation" in the diabetes risk. Diabetes can lead to problems including blindness, nerve damage, heart and kidney disease and poor blood flow to the legs and feet. "I don't think we knew that with the assurance that this paper provides."The paper makes pretty clear that your health improves, even if you gain weight," said Dietz, who was not involved in the research

Megosztás a facebookon